Accommodating the Needs of Designated Students free essay sample

This research paper will identify landmark cases in the areas of student code of conduct,   exceptional needs, and First Amendment rights. The impact of these cases on contemporary education will also be explained.   Furthermore, this research paper will include the responsibilities of schools to accommodate the needs of   designated students as well as how these accommodations   negatively affect the learning environment. Over the last few decades, in Europe, the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, increasing numbers of higher education teachers and researchers have been concentrating on how to improve the quality of teaching and learning. First of all the Educational leaders must be well informed of   the laws that keep an   eye on the function and management of educational institutions. This is very important   to be done in this regard. Furthermore, there is a need that the educational leaders should  Ã‚   implement good judgment in creating reasonable and legally defendable decisions   that   concern students. We will write a custom essay sample on Accommodating the Needs of Designated Students or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Educational leaders will also need to direct the   development and   implementation of reliable and well-developed policies, rules, and regulations pertaining to students. The Bill of Rights characterizes an essential foundation of individual   rights and freedoms given to individuals under the US Constitution. The Constitution of   the   US,   which is a principle source of   law, imparts an outline of law in which governmental   processes function. Although the Constitution does not refer to education, the Constitution and Supreme   Court decisions, do influence the function and management of educational   organizations, altogether with respect to amendments, that safeguard the individual rights of student. Furthermore school administrators have a responsibility to develop an appreciation for   the significance of   landmark cases and be able to recognize similar patterns of   fact   that   one may encounter in an educational setting. In   order   for   any essential   improvements to be accomplished within any educational institute. All individual involved must commit to their improvements. At present, various educational institutions all through the country are attempting whole-school reform, which necessitates considerable modifications in teacher, and administrator actions utilizing the federal funding. Impact on Contemporary Education An implication concerning student code of conduct is that school officials are not liable   for harassment claims unless he or she were aware of the behavior and failed   to   respond   accordingly. However, if students are aware of such behavior, the difficulty might   be   for   school leaders to claim ignorance to the behavior and therefore be susceptible to liability   charges. Landmark cases contain judicial opinions and manage issues in a proper routine that should a permanent part   of educational settings. School officials must appreciate   and   comprehend the importance of these cases to   education. Legal concerns frequently   mentioned in landmark cases include the application and safeguards of First Amendment   rights, student code of conduct and managing students with exceptional needs. Laws   exist to protect the rights of designated students and the school districts responsibility to   these   kind of students. Landmark Cases concerning Student Code of Conducts Harassment is a type of sexual discrimination. In a landmark case, the Supreme Court   ruled that public schools might be sued for failing to contend with students who   harass   their classmates. The Supreme Court also specified that lawsuits are applicable only when the harassing students behavior is severely bad, persistent, offensive, and denies   the victim equal access to an education. In addition, harassment claims are valid   only   when school officials are noticeably unreasonable and intentionally indifferent toward   the alleged harassing behavior. The student, LaShonda Davis, who is black, filed   suit   against the school district in 1992 claiming that school officials failed to take action   concerning harassment by a white student, but later   took action when the same   student   offended another white student. Reasonable suspicion is all that is required for school   officials to initiate a search. The U.S. Supreme Court has decided that when a   school official is conducting a search under reasonable suspicion in school-related searches, he   or she is not violating any constitutional rights. In the landmark case, New Jersey v. T.L.O. in the year 1985 a teacher revealed two girls smoking in a girl’s restroom. T.L.O, one of the students in the restroom denied   the   allegation while her companion stated that she violated school rules. The   assistant vice   principal insisted upon examination of the girls purse and found a pack of   cigarettes. At   the time, the assistant vice principal also noticed a pack of rolling papers typically associated with the use of marijuana, and with this evidence of   drug use, the assistant   vice principal thoroughly examined the purse. Numerous indications of not only   drug   use but the sale of drugs was obtained from the purse.